home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.mindspring.com!usenet
- From: mroot@atl.mindspring.com (Danette & Murray Root)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: > 64K code under small model possible?
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 04:28:47 GMT
- Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
- Message-ID: <4lcdgj$24t4@mule2.mindspring.com>
- References: <4lbvfc$167@nntp1.best.com> <4l4doj$sdl@tribune.concentric.net> <4l4fru$22dg@mule2.mindspring.com> <4latvs$du3@tribune <4lc9ia$emt@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-127-88.dialup.mindspring.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- wemccaug@prairienet.org (Wendy E. McCaughrin) wrote:
-
- => Does this mean no difference between the 'tiny' and 'small' models?
-
- No. Tiny is:
-
- Code + Data < 64k
-
- Small is:
-
- Code < 64k and Data < 64k, But Code + Data may be > 64k
-
- If there's a newsgroup for Intel specific stuff, this really belongs there,
- since it doesn't apply anywhere else.
-
-
-